svn commit: r255323 - in head/sys: amd64/conf i386/conf

[Slawa Olhovchenkov]

On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:32:19PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> On 7 September 2013 14:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw at zxy.spb.ru> wrote:
> 
> 
> > > I think we can aim to get this stuff snuck into -HEAD after 10 branches
> > > off. Sneaking it into -HEAD now would be way too risky. We can always MFC
> > > it later on to hit 10.1 or something.
> >
> > I think now -HEAD can't be more risky by one or two patches.
> 
> 
> Hah, the ol' "it's already broken, we can't possibly make it worse"
> argument. :-)

It's -HEAD! :)
But yes, I fear try -HEAD after June. It's broken verty often.

> It's ultimately up to re@ at this point, but personally I think adding a
> last minute patch to loader primarily for a feature that we'd also have to
> rush in as well is too risky. A lot has changed in -HEAD over the last few
> weeks and in my opinion we should let the dust settle and get people using
> the latest -HEAD before trying out even more new stuff.

As we can see by activity in list planed: ipf 5.1, native iSCSI,
switch off GCC (with broken by clang kernel part), patch ld.so and many others.
Changed in loader and take out modules from kernel at this time is little-o.

> We can always back-port it to -10 (and -9 if people want) later on in the
> year.

Early testing -- early complete.