svn commit: r250379 - in head/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules: . snmp_hast

[Mikolaj Golub]

On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 04:44:54PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Peter Wemm <peter at wemm.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Mikolaj Golub <trociny at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> Author: trociny
> >> Date: Wed May  8 20:03:37 2013
> >> New Revision: 250379
> >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/250379
> >>
> >> Log:
> >>   HAST module for bsnmpd(1).
> >>
> >>   Reviewed by:  harti, pjd
> >>   MFC after:    2 weeks
> >
> > This breaks world on just about everything other than i386, and it is
> > technically broken there too but doesn't actually cause a build
> > failure.
> >
> > You cannot link a .so file against a non-pic library, libl.a in this case.
> >
> > ===> usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_hast (all)^M
> > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libl.a(libyywrap.o
> > ): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a
> >  shared object; recompile with -fPIC^M
> > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libl.a: could not read symbols: Bad value^M
> > *** [snmp_hast.so.6] Error code 1^M
> 
> 
> Hmm. It seems clang optimizes something away that gcc doesn't.  When
> building with clang the problem doesn't show up.

Sorry for breaking build. I am always running tinderbox before commits
like this, which did not help this time. Now I will run it twice, with
both clang and gcc.

Thank you for r250394. I will investigate how to fix this. Any
suggestions are highly appreciated.

-- 
Mikolaj Golub