svn commit: r251886 - in head: contrib/apr contrib/apr-util contrib/serf contrib/sqlite3 contrib/subversion share/mk usr.bin usr.bin/svn usr.bin/svn/lib usr.bin/svn/lib/libapr usr.bin/svn/lib/libap...

[Peter Jeremy]

On 2013-Jun-18 02:53:45 +0000, Peter Wemm <peter at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>Author: peter
>Date: Tue Jun 18 02:53:45 2013
>New Revision: 251886
>URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/251886
>
>Log:
>  Introduce svnlite so that we can check out our source code again.

Somewhat late and to take a tack that wasn't used in the previous thread...

This means we now have 2 copies of SQLite in base - there was already
an older one in Heimdal.  Is there any chance that we could make Heimdal
use the newly added SQLite?  (I'm not suggesting peter@ does this, just
wondering if there's a reason for not getting rid of one copy of SQLite).

(I'm concerned in general at the duplication of code in base - we already
have about 4 copies of gzip and 2 different IEEE floating point emulators).

-- 
Peter Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/attachments/20130629/26706cd6/attachment.sig>