svn commit: r251886 - in head: contrib/apr contrib/apr-util contrib/serf contrib/sqlite3 contrib/subversion share/mk usr.bin usr.bin/svn usr.bin/svn/lib usr.bin/svn/lib/libapr usr.bin/svn/lib/libap...

[Eitan Adler]

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Nikolai Lifanov
<lifanov at mail.lifanov.com> wrote:
> It's net/svnup and is a great replacement for cvs, in my opinion.
> CVS wasn't used for development for a long while anyway, so there is nothing
> subversion is replacing that net/svnup wouldn't.

svnup still has a number of issues: both performance and stability (it
tends to randomly core dump).  I've stated before that I intended to
import svnup when it became ready.

I have no intention in taking part in whatever debate may happen here.
 Should we decide that we want 'svn lite' instead of svnup I am happy.
 Should we decide to use svnup, I am still happy to import it.



-- 
Eitan Adler
Source, Ports, Doc committer
Bugmeister, Ports Security teams