svn commit: r243631 - in head/sys: kern sys
Alfred Perlstein
bright at mu.org
Mon Jan 14 16:17:56 UTC 2013
On 1/14/13 11:05 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> Can timeout() be emulated on top of another API so we can do away with
> it?
yes, this is what callout(9) is for.
there are a few consumers left (see the email I just sent out).
those consumers would just have to allocate their own callout
handle/struct and pass that to callout instead of using timeout(9).
-Alfred
More information about the svn-src-head
mailing list