svn commit: r243631 - in head/sys: kern sys

Alfred Perlstein bright at mu.org
Mon Jan 14 16:17:56 UTC 2013


On 1/14/13 11:05 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> Can timeout() be emulated on top of another API so we can do away with 
> it?

yes, this is what callout(9) is for.

there are a few consumers left (see the email I just sent out).

those consumers would just have to allocate their own callout 
handle/struct and pass that to callout instead of using timeout(9).

-Alfred


More information about the svn-src-head mailing list