svn commit: r242847 - in head/sys: i386/include kern

[Peter Wemm]

On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Alfred Perlstein <bright at mu.org> wrote:
> On 11/10/12 11:33 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:22:52PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
>>>
>>> We've had kern.ipc.nmbclusters for years.  It is simple to understand,
>>> easy to predict the outcome of a change, is runtime adjustable, is a
>>> *cap* and not a reservation (like it used to be) and does not require
>>> a reboot like maxusers tweaking would, and doesn't change maxproc as a
>>> side effect.
>>>
>>> Tune the caps sensibly by default and move on.  maxusers must die.
>>
>> Big +1.  I would also like to get rid of maxusers altogether.
>>
>> ./danfe
>
> You aren't really understanding it.
>
> The contrived examples Peter are giving are *wrong*.

What are the correct numbers then?

-- 
Peter Wemm - peter at wemm.org; peter at FreeBSD.org; peter at yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
"If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete
themselves upon execution." -- Robert Sewell