svn commit: r233052 - head/share/mk

Dimitry Andric dim at FreeBSD.org
Mon Mar 19 19:37:44 UTC 2012


On 2012-03-19 08:21, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 17 Mar 2012 05:40, "Bruce Evans" <brde at optusnet.com.au <mailto:brde at optusnet.com.au>> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>
>>> Log:
>>>  Change the style of share/mk/bsd.sys.mk <http://bsd.sys.mk> to that of the other bsd.*.mk
>>>  files, and style.Makefile(5), where applicable.  While here, update the
>>>  link to the gcc warning documentation.
>>
>>
>> Thanks.  I rather liked the "^.* foo" style for making ifdefs less
>> unreadable, but it didn't look like it was written here, and it is
>> a sign of other problems that so many nested ifdefs are used.  It
>> only used a single space of each level of indentation, so the
>> indentation was still hard too see.
>>
>> The "other bsd.*.mk" files don't include bsd.cpu.mk <http://bsd.cpu.mk>.  This still uses
>> the "^. *foo" style (and is now the only *.mk file one that does this).
>> For assignments, it mostly uses a different unusual style -- just the
>> normal C style of a single space before and after '=' (or '+=').  Weird
>> formattings of assignments are harder to grep for than weird formattings
>> of ".foo", so I didn't try looking for them all.
> 
> Indented .ifs etc are used (inconsistently) in bsd.port.mk <http://bsd.port.mk> et al, and can make a huge difference to readability; make is such a messy language that multiple levels are often needed.

Well, the issue with Makefiles is that you cannot indent the actual
statements.  So even if you sort-of-indent the directives, by adding
spaces between the initial dot and the directive name, you still have a
very messy left margin. :)

It would be much nicer to be able to write:

.if defined(FOO)
  .if defined(BAR)
    CFLAGS+=	-DFOO_BAR
  .endif
.endif

But I guess that would require some overhaul in make.  It doesn't grok
such indentations now.


> Perhaps we should try to agree a standard on them, perhaps two spaces?  It's a shame to be stripping them out.

Two spaces sounds reasonable enough.  Though indent size is probably the
ultimate bikeshed... ;)


More information about the svn-src-head mailing list