svn commit: r230368 - head/tools/regression/usr.bin/cc

[David Schultz]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-01-20 08:55, Roman Divacky wrote:
> >http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11406 says this has been
> >fixed, is this just problem with us having older clang in base?
> 
> Obviously, it has only been fixed in llvm trunk.  If this is a pressing
> problem, we can backport the fix.  Otherwise, it will be fixed when we
> import a more recent snapshot.

It isn't a pressing issue.  The test was failing due to an even
more basic bug than the one I was trying to test; adding two
constants was producing the wrong answer.  Therefore, I can't
confirm that the test now passes, but they did fix *a* bug.

By the way, having dealt with gcc bugs in the past, I found
reporting a clang bug to be an unexpectedly pleasant experience.