svn commit: r228939 - head/sys/dev/mps
Alexander Motin
mav at FreeBSD.org
Mon Jan 9 18:58:13 UTC 2012
On 09.01.2012 20:54, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Alexander Motin<mav at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Author: mav
>> Date: Wed Dec 28 22:49:28 2011
>> New Revision: 228939
>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228939
>>
>> Log:
>> Set maximum I/O size for mps(4) to MAXPHYS. Looking into the code, I see
>> no reason why it should be limited to 64K of DFLTPHYS. DMA data tag is any
>> way set to allow MAXPHYS, S/G lists (chain elements) are sufficient and
>> overflows are also handled. On my tests even 1MB I/Os are working fine.
>>
>> Reviewed by: ken@
>>
>> Modified:
>> head/sys/dev/mps/mps_sas.c
>>
>> Modified: head/sys/dev/mps/mps_sas.c
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- head/sys/dev/mps/mps_sas.c Wed Dec 28 22:18:53 2011 (r228938)
>> +++ head/sys/dev/mps/mps_sas.c Wed Dec 28 22:49:28 2011 (r228939)
>> @@ -937,6 +937,7 @@ mpssas_action(struct cam_sim *sim, union
>> cpi->transport_version = 0;
>> cpi->protocol = PROTO_SCSI;
>> cpi->protocol_version = SCSI_REV_SPC;
>> + cpi->maxio = MAXPHYS;
>> cpi->ccb_h.status = CAM_REQ_CMP;
>> break;
>> }
>
> sorry for the late reply, but can we make in into tunable please? i
> have in local tree
>
> --- mps_sas.c.orig 2011-11-17 02:05:04.000000000 -0800
> +++ mps_sas.c 2011-12-28 16:05:10.000000000 -0800
> @@ -121,6 +121,11 @@
>
> MALLOC_DEFINE(M_MPSSAS, "MPSSAS", "MPS SAS memory");
>
> +int mps_maxio = MAXPHYS;
> +TUNABLE_INT("hw.mps.maxio",&mps_maxio);
> +SYSCTL_INT(_hw_mps, OID_AUTO, maxio, CTLFLAG_RD,&mps_maxio, 0,
> + "CAM maxio override\n");
> +
> static __inline int mpssas_set_lun(uint8_t *lun, u_int ccblun);
> static struct mpssas_target * mpssas_alloc_target(struct mpssas_softc *,
> struct mpssas_target *);
> @@ -938,6 +943,7 @@
> cpi->protocol = PROTO_SCSI;
> cpi->protocol_version = SCSI_REV_SPC;
> cpi->ccb_h.status = CAM_REQ_CMP;
> + cpi->maxio = mps_maxio;
> break;
> }
> case XPT_GET_TRAN_SETTINGS:
We can. but could you explain why? Have you found any problems this change?
--
Alexander Motin
More information about the svn-src-head
mailing list