svn commit: r222795 - head/sys/dev/atkbdc

John Baldwin jhb at freebsd.org
Tue Jun 7 18:02:13 UTC 2011


On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:39:26 am Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 June 2011 09:52 am, John Baldwin wrote:
> The whole point of this commit is to blacklist *recent* BIOS (or CSM) 
> from probing keyboard typematic information, more specifically, 
> recent Intel chipset platforms.  They don't support many INT 15h/16h 
> functions but only cause trouble at best.  OTOH, I haven't seen such 
> problems with AMD chipset systems and they all seem to have 
> traditional entry points at the interrupt vector table, for example.

Err, but you didn't blacklist recent BIOS.  You blacklist _all_ BIOS that use 
entry points other than the ones from the UEFI spec, including BIOSes that 
don't claim to support UEFI and the BIOS from the two systems I quoted.

> > You might as well just turn the check off on all machines at this
> > point rather than using completely arbitrary tests that are only
> > valid on a small fraction of the x86 universe.
> 
> I don't think it is "completely" arbitrary.  If it doesn't have the 
> traditional entry points, it is very unlikely to support keyboard 
> typematic in the first place.  Please let me know if you have any 
> counter example.

Umm, I just gave you two examples.  UEFI is not a standard appropriate to the 
vast majority of x86 BIOS implementations.  It is far, far too narrow.

Put another way, we should assume that all non-recent BIOSes do not conform to 
UEFI (since many older systems pre-date the UEFI spec for one) and that they 
have all been effectively blacklisted now.  Given that, you've now restricted 
this functionality to only a subset of recent BIOSes and have blacklisted the 
rest of the known universe.

However, the simplest fix is probably to just remove this entirely as I doubt 
anyone really depends on the BIOS settings for these anyway.

-- 
John Baldwin


More information about the svn-src-head mailing list