svn commit: r219003 - head/usr.bin/nice

[Remko Lodder]

On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:47 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
> 
>> On Thursday, February 24, 2011 2:03:33 pm Remko Lodder wrote:
>>> 
> [contex restored:
> +A priority of 19 or 20 will prevent a process from taking any cycles from
> +others at nice 0 or better.]


[strip information overload].

So, what is the consensus instead of overwelming me with too much information?
-- 
/"\   Best regards,                        | remko at FreeBSD.org
\ /   Remko Lodder                      |
X    http://www.evilcoder.org/    | Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
/ \   ASCII Ribbon Campaign    | Against HTML Mail and News