svn commit: r220387 - head/sys/vm
John Baldwin
jhb at freebsd.org
Wed Apr 6 21:29:38 UTC 2011
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 3:27:28 pm Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:04:47PM +0200, Edward Tomasz Napiera?a wrote:
> > Wiadomo?? napisana przez Garrett Cooper w dniu 2011-04-06, o godz. 18:57:
> > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierala
> > > <trasz at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > >> Author: trasz
> > >> Date: Wed Apr 6 16:27:04 2011
> > >> New Revision: 220387
> > >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/220387
> > >>
> > >> Log:
> > >> In vm_daemon(), do not skip processes stopped with SIGSTOP.
> > >
> > > Did you run this by anyone else before you committed the change?
> >
> > The whole racct patchset was reviewed by kib@, and I seem to remember
> > that he said this might cause problems. However, I didn't encounter
> > any problems with this, neither did any person testing the patchset.
> >
> > So, what's wrong with this?
> I remember that I disliked the whole approach of handling RSS limits,
> and still hold the same opinion.
> I said something about honoring the limit at the time of page allocation
> or page-in, and not `offline' as it is committed, by periodic scans
> by daemon.
Yes, to be truly useful the limit has to prevent excessive page allocation
at the time the allocation is performed (by blocking until another page
is swapped out or failing, etc.).
--
John Baldwin
More information about the svn-src-head
mailing list