svn commit: r212647 - head/sys/sys

[John Baldwin]

On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:42:40 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 15/09/2010 19:30 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> > SET_DECLARE would expand to exactly those two lines.
> > I am not sure why comment even said that it's impossible to use SET_DECLARE(),
> > perhaps previously it used to expand to something bigger?
> 
> Having said that, I am not sure if it makes logical sense to use SET_DECLARE() in
> pcpu.h.  Family of SET_* macros seems to be geared towards sets that contain
> arrays of identical items (e.g. see SET_ITEM, SET_COUNT).  set_pcpu reserves space
> for items of various types and sizes.  So I am not sure if using any SET_* macros
> would not be confusing in the future.
> 
> What do you think?

Hmm, you could use SET_START() and SET_LIMIT() at least, but it's not a big
deal either way.  The comment seemed to imply that it would have used
SET_DECLARE() if there had not been technical difficulties.

-- 
John Baldwin