svn commit: r189765 - in head: . lib/libc lib/libc/nls

[Norikatsu Shigemura]

Hi Sean!

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:12:00 -0500 (CDT)
"Sean C. Farley" <scf at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >> functionality, however, the Citrus website is ambiguous about the
> >> license.
> > 	Really? > ambigous
> > 	Citrus is licensed under BSD License or variant (like
> > 	Perl or MIT).  It can use with (L)GPL.
> > 	WWW: http://citrus.bsdclub.org/
> OK.  Technically, the website is not ambiguous.  It is the license that 
> is ambiguous.  :)  At least, they claim it is:

	Ah, OK.  They, Citrus developers, consider that it is licensed
	under BSD License on *BSD, at least.  In fact, on NetBSD/OpenBSD,
	it is licensed under BSD License, and we can use it under BSD
	License.

	But it may be used on other environment like X.  So it is licensed
	under dual(multiple?) license.