svn commit: r186955 - in head/sys: conf netinet
adrian at freebsd.org
Sat Jan 10 15:35:13 PST 2009
2009/1/10 Robert Watson <rwatson at freebsd.org>:
> If the API turns out to be effectly semantically the same, or better, then I
> think the suggestion is to entirely replace, rather than supplement, the
> socket option you just added with it. There's no point in having
> pointlessly divergent APIs where it can be avoided.
I'll look into it.
More information about the svn-src-head