svn commit: r186955 - in head/sys: conf netinet

Adrian Chadd adrian at
Sat Jan 10 15:35:13 PST 2009

2009/1/10 Robert Watson <rwatson at>:

> If the API turns out to be effectly semantically the same, or better, then I
> think the suggestion is to entirely replace, rather than supplement, the
> socket option you just added with it.  There's no point in having
> pointlessly divergent APIs where it can be avoided.

I'll look into it.


More information about the svn-src-head mailing list