svn commit: r352465 - head/share/mk

Enji Cooper yaneurabeya at gmail.com
Wed Sep 18 14:58:35 UTC 2019


> On Sep 18, 2019, at 06:53, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019, 1:41 PM Kyle Evans <kevans at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:34 AM Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Sep 17, 2019, at 18:58, Kyle Evans <kevans at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Author: kevans
>> > > Date: Wed Sep 18 01:58:56 2019
>> > > New Revision: 352465
>> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/352465
>> > >
>> > > Log:
>> > >  googletest: default-disable on all of MIPS for now
>> > >
>> > >  Parts of the fusefs tests trigger a bug in current versions of llvm: IR
>> > >  representation of some routine for the MIPS targets is a function with a
>> > >  large number of arguments. This then leads the compiler on an hour+ long
>> > >  goose chase, which is OK if you build the current tree but less-so if you're
>> > >  trying external toolchain or doing a universe build involving mips when it
>> > >  eventually gets switched over to LLVM.
>> > >
>> > >  Better, accurate details can be found in LLVM PR43263.
>> >
>> > Uhhhhh... why not do this in tests/sys/... instead?
>> 
>> Because there's still value in being able to easily enable these for
>> building/running the complete set of tests through standard build
>> infrastructure, but it's not worth adding a knob specifically for the
>> fusefs tests. I also prefer the communication of it being an
>> off-by-default option and easily deduced from src.conf(5) that this
>> part of the build is default-disabled on mips/mips.
> 
> 
> This is the right way to do this, imho...

I disagree: disabling a framework and all tests dependent on it because of compile times for a single test suite is the wrong approach. I would complain more loudly (for instance), if MK_TESTS were disabled on mips, just because of a build or test issue with a single test.

This change throws the baby out with the bath water. The only reason why I’m not asking for a revert is that mips is a tier 2 arch which I haven’t verified, and the bath tub that’s being emptied is small, as many folks haven’t written GoogleTest tests yet in the src tree.

-Enji


More information about the svn-src-all mailing list