svn commit: r344701 - head/sbin/camcontrol

[Ian Lepore]

On Sun, 2019-03-03 at 12:20 -0800, Enji Cooper wrote:
> > On Mar 3, 2019, at 11:12, Steven Hartland <steven at multiplay.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Not really much more to say that isn't explained by that and the
> > code.
> > 
> > Sure I could have used a different sentence structure for the body
> > but it wouldn't add anything IMO, thoughts?
> 
>     Why the previous sector size was wrong isn’t clear from the
> commit message. Why switch from a sizeof to 0?
> Cheers!
> -Enji
> 

The commit message said it was "incorrect / unused". While a bit terse,
it does communicate that the old value was incorrect (by being there at
all) because the value is unused (so zero more clearly expresses that).

It's not completely a joke that most English-speaking software
engineers have English as a second language. :)

-- Ian