svn commit: r350005 - head/sys/kern

[Konstantin Belousov]

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:08:39AM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 7/30/19 10:14 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > No, you should create a situation where the python process ends the endless
> > loop, as reported.  Then, it should become killable by 9 with the first
> > chunk only applied.
> > 
> 
> I don't have an easy way to test that. kill -9 inside the loop didn't
> work. Once the loop ended the process was done; it is very short lived
> and the calling code is buried in Python I think.
With only the umtxq_check_susp() chunk applied, you would wait for
python to start looping, then verify that kill -9 works.

Anyway, I believe that the change is correct, and put the review at
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21124.  I will commit after it get some
sanity checking by mentioned people.