svn commit: r350005 - head/sys/kern

[Konstantin Belousov]

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:40:28PM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> This 2nd change alone (&& count1 == 0) was sufficient to fix the endless
> loop problem.
Good, thank you.

> 
> I am not sure how to test the umtxq_check_susp() change. Do I just need
> to ptrace the process?

No, you should create a situation where the python process ends the endless
loop, as reported.  Then, it should become killable by 9 with the first
chunk only applied.