svn commit: r344567 - in head: etc/mtree include sbin sbin/veriexec

John Baldwin jhb at
Wed Feb 27 20:17:37 UTC 2019

On 2/26/19 10:06 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 2/26/19 9:23 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:12:11AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On 2/26/19 5:49 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:19:45PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>> Just a small nit, for future reference, from the template:
>>>>>> Differential Revision:
>>>>> (*full* phabric URL needed).
>>>> IMHO we should just fix the scripts to accept D#### alone, without
>>>> the URL.  We don't do that for PR (bugzilla) references, and the fact
>>>> that we do for the phab is both needless and confusing.  Also, that
>>>> URL might change one day while we could probably keep the old numbers
>>>> if we move.
>>> It makes the review clickable in many mail clients which is very handy.
>> I understand that, but then again, we don't do that for PRs and people
>> don't seem to complain.  Accepting D#### would make this all consistent
>> and commit messages cleaner.  Arguably, if one likes to click the URLs
>> in their mail client, why not configure the client to expand the URL in
>> place?
>>> --
>>> John Baldwin
>>> \x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a
>> Can you do something about this horde of \x9a's appended to your every
>> email John?
> Bizarre, that's the first time someone has mentioned that.  It appears to
> be a misfeature of Thunderbird which I switched to last year after kmail
> in kde5 officially moved to "unusable trash fire" status.  It doesn't show
> up locally, and the signature file I'm using doesn't contain them:
> % hexdump .signature 
> 0000000 2d 2d 20 0a 4a 6f 68 6e 20 42 61 6c 64 77 69 6e
> 0000010 0a                                             
> 0000011
> Switching to using an inline signature instead of a signature file didn't
> fix it either. :(  I haven't found an existing bug report for this yet.

With a tip from cem@ I narrowed the cause of this down to a "Wrap Text"
plugin I had been using to annotate where to wrap text in the compose
window.  I've disabled it, so the spam should be gone.  My mails might not
wrap sanely though. :-/

John Baldwin

More information about the svn-src-all mailing list