svn commit: r339350 - head/contrib/elftoolchain/elfcopy

Konstantin Belousov kostikbel at gmail.com
Tue Oct 16 07:26:27 UTC 2018


On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 07:39:32AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:53 PM Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 07:13, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > Hi Antoine, did you bisect to this rev or does it just look like the
> > > most probable candidate? Can you copy a pair of differing .o files
> > > (say, gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o) from the work dir to freefall?
> >
> > Antoine provided a tarball of the work dir to me, and pointed out that
> > the *-checksum.o files are not interesting - they are warnings only
> > and are present prior to the identified change.
> >
> > Comparing one of the other differing files, e.g.
> > stage{2,3}-gcc/expmed.o, demonstrates the problem. Gcc's build
> > machinery is reasonably obfuscated so I'm not sure of the exact set of
> > operations, but I can infer that the stage2/stage3 comparison is
> > running strip on the object files and then comparing the result. Gcc
> > is encountering this part of my strip/objcopy change:
> >
> > > Stripping binaries with relocations
> > > referencing removed symbols was already broken, and after this change
> > > may still be broken in a different way.
> >
> > Stripping symbols and relocations from an object file is not a
> > particularly useful operation, since the object then can't be linked
> > or otherwise used. But it seems Gcc's stage comparison relies on this.
> > I did try running "strip --strip-debug" on stage{2,3}-gcc/expmed.o (a
> > reasonable operation on object files) and that produced identical
> > output.
> >
> > It may well be that a further change to ELF Tool Chain's strip is
> > warranted, but I suspect the most straightforward and reliable fix
> > here will be to just have gcc use GNU strip.
> 
> The attached patch for the gcc ports fixes the failures for me.
> 
> Antoine

> Index: lang/gcc48/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- lang/gcc48/Makefile	(revision 482165)
> +++ lang/gcc48/Makefile	(working copy)
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  SUFFIX=		${PORTVERSION:C/([0-9]+).([0-9]+).*/\1\2/}
>  USES=		compiler cpe gmake iconv libtool makeinfo perl5 tar:bzip2
>  USE_BINUTILS=	yes
> +BINARY_ALIAS=	strip=${LOCALBASE}/bin/strip
Shouldn't USE_BINUTILS automatically prefer all binaries from there to be
used, instead of the base system variants ?


More information about the svn-src-all mailing list