svn commit: r334617 - in head: . etc

[Brooks Davis]

On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 01:39:21AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 07.06.2018 22:35, Brooks Davis wrote:
> 
> >>>> You see, my point is that you can never know beforehand of all 
> >>>> challenges a sysadmin faces in fields.
> >>>> And there should be really good reason to break things that work before.
> >>>> Like, solving some significant issue we have with current setup. Do we 
> >>>> have such?
> >>>
> >>> This is not affected by my changes, you can install *additional* things in /etc/rc.d and they won't be touched just as today.
> >>
> >> Do we have any convention on naming such custom additional scripts installed in /etc/rc.d
> >> locally so that installworld would never overwrite them silently?
> > 
> > script-domain.tld is almost certainly safe.
> 
> That is, "script.local" should always be fine? That's fine.

In practice anything with a '.' is going to be safe because such scripts
can't have name=<file-name> which is our internal convention.

-- Brooks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/attachments/20180607/2a73d90a/attachment.sig>