svn commit: r328593 - head/release/scripts

[Nathan Whitehorn]

Do we even want to include the ports tree on install media? Extracting 
ports from some out-of-date tarball doesn't seem to match best practices 
for ports and it takes up quite a lot of space.
-Nathan

On 01/30/18 08:34, Steve Wills wrote:
> Author: swills (ports committer)
> Date: Tue Jan 30 16:34:56 2018
> New Revision: 328593
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/328593
>
> Log:
>    Change installer default to not install ports tree
>    
>    Reviewed by:	gjb, dteske, allanjude, bdrewery, mat
>    Approved by:	gjb
>    Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14064
>
> Modified:
>    head/release/scripts/make-manifest.sh
>
> Modified: head/release/scripts/make-manifest.sh
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/release/scripts/make-manifest.sh	Tue Jan 30 16:24:15 2018	(r328592)
> +++ head/release/scripts/make-manifest.sh	Tue Jan 30 16:34:56 2018	(r328593)
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ desc_tests="${tests}"
>   
>   default_doc=off
>   default_src=off
> +default_ports=off
>   default_tests=off
>   default_base_dbg=off
>   default_lib32_dbg=off
>