svn commit: r327559 - in head: . sys/net

[Eugene Grosbein]

05.01.2018 16:34, Steven Hartland wrote:

>>> I hope there's some improvements that can be made, for example if we can determine
>>> the stream was instigated remotely then flowid would always be valid hence we can use it assuming it
>>> matches the requested spec or if we can make it clear to the user that laggproto is not the one they requested, I'm open to ideas?
>> We just need to clear flow id from incoming TCP segments and always generate new flow id for responses
>> keeping old flow id for IP forwarding case. Please back out your change to not degrade IP forwarding performance.
> Sorry I don't follow you. You seem to be inferring that we can easily generate a flowid without involving the sending hardware

RSS has nothing to do with sending hardware. It's operating system's job to choose outgoing port, not hardware's job.

> I can't see how that is possible as that's chicken and egg i.e. you can't get the HW interface
> to generate the flowid without sending a packet and you can't send a packet
> until you have a the flowid to decide which interface to send it from.

Outgoing packet flow does not and should not depend on incoming flow,
they are independent things in case of LACP. There is no "chicken and egg" problem at all.