svn commit: r315662 - in head: contrib/bsnmp/snmp_mibII contrib/ipfilter/ipsend lib/libprocstat sys/netinet sys/sys usr.bin/netstat usr.bin/sockstat usr.bin/systat usr.sbin/tcpdrop usr.sbin/trpt

Ronald Klop ronald-lists at klop.ws
Tue Mar 21 11:27:43 UTC 2017


On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:19:24 +0100, Mathieu Arnold <mat at freebsd.org> wrote:

> Le 21/03/2017 à 08:27, Gleb Smirnoff a écrit :
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 08:22:19AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> B> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:54:33PM -0700, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>> B> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 07:50:32AM +0100, Antoine Brodin wrote:
>> B> > A> >   This change is known to break a ton of ports. More than 100  
>> if
>> B> > A> > counting depends. I'm sorry for that and I already started to  
>> fix
>> B> > A> > them.
>> B> > A> >
>> B> > A> > Please send all new breakages to me.
>> B> > A>
>> B> > A> Hi,
>> B> > A>
>> B> > A> Exp-runs should happen before breakage happens, not after.
>> B> > A> If you already know that it breaks hundreds of ports, please  
>> revert
>> B> > A> and request an exp-run.
>> B> >
>> B> > The exp-run has already been made:
>> B> >
>> B> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210673
>> B> >
>> B> > Wasn't very helpful.
>> B> >
>> B>
>> B> I disagree it was useful it showed you some ports that were breaking  
>> given there
>> B> was some high level one you were expected to provide patches to fix  
>> them.
>>
>> I'm working on them right now.
>
> You should have worked on it *before* the patch breaking everything
> landed, providing patches for the ports that were reported as broken,
> and repeat until all the ports that were building before were building
> again.
>
> You should **not** have committed the patch to the src tree before all
> those patches were created, and you should have committed all the
> patches at once, preferably before committing the patch to the src tree.
>
>



People should...
No ports are broken on released version of FreeBSD. The broken ones are  
being fixed.
And a very good improvement of code has happened. Maybe a notice in  
UPDATING helps third-party people.
I don't see a real problem. Only progress.

Ronald.


More information about the svn-src-all mailing list