svn commit: r326554 - in head: . usr.bin/sponge usr.bin/sponge/tests usr.bin/tee

[Cy Schubert]

In message <201712051258.vB5CwjQN051356 at pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>, "Rodney W. 
Gri
mes" writes:
> [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Eitan Adler <eadler at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > Author: eadler
> > > Date: Tue Dec  5 03:55:10 2017
> > > New Revision: 326554
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/326554
> > >
> > > Log:
> > >   sponge(1): initial commit
> > >
> > >   sponge(1) is a utility that reads input until
> > >   complete, then opens the output file, then
> > >   writes to it. This makes it useful in pipelines
> > >   that read and write to the same file.
> > >
> > >   Reviewed by:  wblock, jilles, imp, cem, danfe (all: various iterations)
> > 
> > I don't recall reviewing this in any iteration, but I could be mistaken.
>
> I do not see any of these names with checks in the reviewed by box,
> providing feedback in a review != reviewed by unless they have
> accepted it.
>
> Further more, why does freebsd need this in base?

When I saw this commit in the inbox on my phone I asked the same question. 
Why is this in base? Especially with tools which are in the same class as 
this already in ports, should this not be a port?


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy at FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org

	The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.