svn commit: r300233 - stable/10/share/mk

[Simon J. Gerraty]

Bryan Drewery <bdrewery at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > I always assumed there was a good reason for not allowing that.
> > is there not a "WITH_FOO" or "WITHOUT_FOO" for every MK_FOO?
> 
> Which takes precedence? Using make MK_FOO=no allows forcing it off

WITHOUT_ wins this was topic of long discussion - I guess back in 2014
;-)

The original semantics of {MK_,WITH[OUT]_} were almost unusable,
they are at least now consistently predictable.