svn commit: r298804 - in head/sys/ufs: ffs ufs

[Pedro F. Giffuni]

Author: pfg
Date: Fri Apr 29 20:43:51 2016
New Revision: 298804
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/298804

Log:
  UFS: spelling fixes on comments.
  
  No functional change.

Modified:
  head/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c
  head/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c
  head/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c
  head/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h
  head/sys/ufs/ufs/dirhash.h
  head/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_acl.c

Modified: head/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c	Fri Apr 29 20:33:20 2016	(r298803)
+++ head/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c	Fri Apr 29 20:43:51 2016	(r298804)
@@ -1231,7 +1231,7 @@ ffs_dirpref(pip)
 	 * backwards or even to alternate looking forward and backward,
 	 * this approach fails badly when the filesystem is nearly full.
 	 * Specifically, we first search all the areas that have no space
-	 * and finally try the one preceeding that. We repeat this on
+	 * and finally try the one preceding that. We repeat this on
 	 * every request and in the case of the final block end up
 	 * searching the entire filesystem. By jumping to the front
 	 * of the filesystem, our future forward searches always look
@@ -1351,7 +1351,7 @@ ffs_blkpref_ufs1(ip, lbn, indx, bap)
 	/*
 	 * If we are at the beginning of a file, or we have already allocated
 	 * the maximum number of blocks per cylinder group, or we do not
-	 * have a block allocated immediately preceeding us, then we need
+	 * have a block allocated immediately preceding us, then we need
 	 * to decide where to start allocating new blocks.
 	 */
 	if (indx % fs->fs_maxbpg == 0 || bap[indx - 1] == 0) {
@@ -1456,7 +1456,7 @@ ffs_blkpref_ufs2(ip, lbn, indx, bap)
 	/*
 	 * If we are at the beginning of a file, or we have already allocated
 	 * the maximum number of blocks per cylinder group, or we do not
-	 * have a block allocated immediately preceeding us, then we need
+	 * have a block allocated immediately preceding us, then we need
 	 * to decide where to start allocating new blocks.
 	 */
 	if (indx % fs->fs_maxbpg == 0 || bap[indx - 1] == 0) {

Modified: head/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c	Fri Apr 29 20:33:20 2016	(r298803)
+++ head/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c	Fri Apr 29 20:43:51 2016	(r298804)
@@ -13187,7 +13187,7 @@ softdep_request_cleanup(fs, vp, cred, re
 	 *
 	 * Additionally, if we are unpriviledged and allocating space,
 	 * we need to ensure that we clean up enough blocks to get the
-	 * needed number of blocks over the threshhold of the minimum
+	 * needed number of blocks over the threshold of the minimum
 	 * number of blocks required to be kept free by the filesystem
 	 * (fs_minfree).
 	 */
@@ -13888,7 +13888,7 @@ getdirtybuf(bp, lock, waitfor)
 		error = BUF_LOCK(bp,
 		    LK_EXCLUSIVE | LK_SLEEPFAIL | LK_INTERLOCK, lock);
 		/*
-		 * Even if we sucessfully acquire bp here, we have dropped
+		 * Even if we successfully acquire bp here, we have dropped
 		 * lock, which may violates our guarantee.
 		 */
 		if (error == 0)

Modified: head/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c	Fri Apr 29 20:33:20 2016	(r298803)
+++ head/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c	Fri Apr 29 20:43:51 2016	(r298804)
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ ffs_mountfs(devvp, mp, td)
 		goto out;
 	}
 	fs->fs_fmod = 0;
-	fs->fs_flags &= ~FS_INDEXDIRS;	/* no support for directory indicies */
+	fs->fs_flags &= ~FS_INDEXDIRS;	/* no support for directory indices */
 	fs->fs_flags &= ~FS_UNCLEAN;
 	if (fs->fs_clean == 0) {
 		fs->fs_flags |= FS_UNCLEAN;

Modified: head/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h	Fri Apr 29 20:33:20 2016	(r298803)
+++ head/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h	Fri Apr 29 20:43:51 2016	(r298804)
@@ -401,8 +401,8 @@ CTASSERT(sizeof(struct fs) == 1376);
  * flag to enforce that inconsistent filesystems be mounted read-only.
  * The FS_INDEXDIRS flag when set indicates that the kernel maintains
  * on-disk auxiliary indexes (such as B-trees) for speeding directory
- * accesses. Kernels that do not support auxiliary indicies clear the
- * flag to indicate that the indicies need to be rebuilt (by fsck) before
+ * accesses. Kernels that do not support auxiliary indices clear the
+ * flag to indicate that the indices need to be rebuilt (by fsck) before
  * they can be used.
  *
  * FS_ACLS indicates that POSIX.1e ACLs are administratively enabled

Modified: head/sys/ufs/ufs/dirhash.h
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/ufs/ufs/dirhash.h	Fri Apr 29 20:33:20 2016	(r298803)
+++ head/sys/ufs/ufs/dirhash.h	Fri Apr 29 20:43:51 2016	(r298804)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
  * together on a TAILQ list, and hashes with higher scores filter
  * towards the tail (most recently used) end of the list.
  *
- * New hash entries are given an inital score of DH_SCOREINIT and are
+ * New hash entries are given an initial score of DH_SCOREINIT and are
  * placed at the most-recently-used end of the list. This helps a lot
  * in the worst-case case scenario where every directory access is
  * to a directory that is not hashed (i.e. the working set of hash

Modified: head/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_acl.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_acl.c	Fri Apr 29 20:33:20 2016	(r298803)
+++ head/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_acl.c	Fri Apr 29 20:43:51 2016	(r298804)
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ ufs_getacl_nfs4(struct vop_getacl_args *
 
 /*
  * Read POSIX.1e ACL from an EA.  Return error if its not found
- * or if any other error has occured.
+ * or if any other error has occurred.
  */
 static int
 ufs_get_oldacl(acl_type_t type, struct oldacl *old, struct vnode *vp,