svn commit: r279814 - head/sys/arm/conf

[Ian Lepore]

On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 15:43 +0000, Warner Losh wrote:
> Author: imp
> Date: Mon Mar  9 15:43:33 2015
> New Revision: 279814
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/279814
> 
> Log:
>   Add the DTrace modules to the build, rather than only build the dtrace
>   modules.
> 
> Modified:
>   head/sys/arm/conf/BEAGLEBONE
> 
> Modified: head/sys/arm/conf/BEAGLEBONE
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/sys/arm/conf/BEAGLEBONE	Mon Mar  9 15:31:33 2015	(r279813)
> +++ head/sys/arm/conf/BEAGLEBONE	Mon Mar  9 15:43:33 2015	(r279814)
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ makeoptions	WITHOUT_MODULES="ahc"
>  options 	KDTRACE_HOOKS		# Kernel DTrace hooks
>  options 	DDB_CTF			# all architectures - kernel ELF linker loads CTF data
>  makeoptions	WITH_CTF=1
> -makeoptions	MODULES_OVERRIDE="opensolaris dtrace dtrace/lockstat dtrace/profile dtrace/fbt"
> +makeoptions	MODULES_EXTRA="opensolaris dtrace dtrace/lockstat dtrace/profile dtrace/fbt"
>  
>  options 	HZ=100
>  options 	SCHED_4BSD		# 4BSD scheduler
> 
> 

Can we not do this, and instead just build all modules?  I'm not sure
why we eliminate or override modules on some armv6 socs and not on
others, but I think it's a concept that's past it's sell-by date now.
If there are a few specific modules that aren't good for arm, we should
be fixing that in the modules makefiles.

I've got some WIP along these lines for beaglebone that's about ready to
commit, so I'm asking your opinion, not for you to do all the work.

-- Ian