svn commit: r284198 - head/bin/ls

[Steve Kargl]

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:22:03AM +0100, Bruce Simpson wrote:
> 
> But I have yet to see a coherent argument here -- size(1) numbers, RSS 
> figures etc. -- about how it allegedly adds bloat. Most of what I've 
> seen so far is POLA, NIH resistance, and hand-wavery.
> 

It is not alleged.  I actaully measured the bloat libxo
caused when w(1) was converted.

https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2015-March/054917.html

Here's the bloat with ls(1)

% ldd /bin/ls 
/bin/ls:
        libutil.so.9 => /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x2807d000)
        libncursesw.so.8 => /lib/libncursesw.so.8 (0x2808f000)
        libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x280db000)
% ll /bin/ls
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  - 28568 Jun  7 21:01 /bin/ls*

% ldd /bin/ls
/bin/ls:
        libutil.so.9 => /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x2807d000)
        libncursesw.so.8 => /lib/libncursesw.so.8 (0x2808f000)
        libxo.so.0 => /lib/libxo.so.0 (0x280db000)
        libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x280ec000)
laptop-kargl:kargl[204] ll /bin/ls
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  - 31376 Jun 14 10:06 /bin/ls*

-- 
Steve