svn commit: r278323 - in head: etc/rc.d usr.sbin/jail

Garrett Cooper yaneurabeya at gmail.com
Sat Feb 7 05:31:57 UTC 2015


On Feb 6, 2015, at 21:27, James Gritton <jamie at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 2015-02-06 22:18, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Feb 6, 2015, at 9:54, Jamie Gritton <jamie at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> Modified: head/usr.sbin/jail/command.c
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- head/usr.sbin/jail/command.c	Fri Feb  6 17:43:13 2015	(r278322)
>>> +++ head/usr.sbin/jail/command.c	Fri Feb  6 17:54:53 2015	(r278323)
>>> @@ -112,6 +112,12 @@ next_command(struct cfjail *j)
>>> 				if (!bool_param(j->intparams[IP_MOUNT_FDESCFS]))
>>> 					continue;
>>> 				j->comstring = &dummystring;
>>> +				break;
>>> +			case IP_MOUNT_PROCFS:
>>> +				if (!bool_param(j->intparams[IP_MOUNT_PROCFS]))
>>> +					continue;
>>> +				j->comstring = &dummystring;
>>> +				break;
>> Did you intend on adding another break? The code would previously fall
>> through to the next case statement...
>>> 			case IP__OP:
>>> 			case IP_STOP_TIMEOUT:
>>> 				j->comstring = &dummystring;
> 
> Yes.  The code did indeed previously fall to the next case, but it was a no-op: the next case only had the same exact assignment that had just taken place (j->comstring = &dummystring).  The lack of a break that had existed before was just some sloppy coding that I didn't notice at the time because it didn't actually change any behavior.  Nonetheless it seemed worth correcting when I noticed it.

True. I looked at the code afterwards and it looks ok. mount.procfs doesn’t exist in my environment. Is that command correct?

$ which mount.procfs; echo $?
1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/attachments/20150206/faa45cde/attachment.sig>


More information about the svn-src-all mailing list