svn commit: r286223 - head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs

[Steven Hartland]

On 03/08/2015 21:48, Warner Losh wrote:
>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 1:44 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw at zxy.spb.ru> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 03:35:50AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/3/15 8:03 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>>>>> For this change I don't want to get into fixing the thread0 stack size,
>>>>> which can be done later, just
>>>>> to provide a reasonable warning to the user that smaller values could
>>>>> cause a panic.
>>>> Hmm, is it limited to the thread0 only ?  I.e., would only increasing
>>>> the initial thread stack size be enough to boot the kernel ?  The zfs
>>>> threads do request larger stack size, I know this.
>>>>
>>>> Can somebody test the following patch in the i386 configuration which
>>>> does not boot ?
>>> I think this is a reasonable thing to do. Thread0 (and proc0) are special.
>>> I don't see why giving it a specially sized stack would be a problem.
>> This is always do for ARM.
>> May be need increase stack size for Thread0 on ARM too?
> Seems reasonable. There should be a MI way of doing this, but all the code and defines are buried in MD files, so each architecture needs some love to make this a reality.
>
> Warner
In the mean time are people happier with 
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3279 or should I just leave it using the 
#define until someone has time to work on a full solution?

     Regards
     Steve