svn commit: r266349 - in head: share/mk sys/conf

[John-Mark Gurney]

Warner Losh wrote this message on Tue, May 20, 2014 at 15:16 -0600:
> 
> On May 20, 2014, at 3:14 PM, John-Mark Gurney <jmg at funkthat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Andrew Turner wrote this message on Sun, May 18, 2014 at 20:56 +0100:
> >> On Sat, 17 May 2014 20:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
> >> Warner Losh <imp at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Author: imp
> >>> Date: Sat May 17 20:31:34 2014
> >>> New Revision: 266349
> >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266349
> >>> 
> >>> Log:
> >>>  The time is not yet ripe to break the lack of dependencies between
> >>>  src/sys and the rest of the tree for builds.
> >>>  o eliminate including bsd.mkopts.mk for the moment in kern.opts.mk
> >>>  o No need to include src.opts.mk at all anymore. The reasons for it
> >>>    are now coverted in sys.mk and src.sys.mk.
> >> 
> >> This breaks ARM kernel builds as MK_ARM_EABI is undefined, at least on
> >> 9.x. The below patch fixes it for me.
> > 
> > But isn't armeb's ABI OABI on 9?  so defaulting this to yes would change
> > the ABI as you build on 9.x wouldn't it?  Or am I just confused by your
> > throwing in 9.x into the mix?
> 
> First, this is current only.
> 
> Second, I?m not changing the ABI on 9.
> 
> Third, building 9.x armeb binaries is unaffected by the host compiler and build environment. It will continue to be what it was last week or last month independent of my changes.

Oh, I think Andy was complaining about building -HEAD on 9.x, not about
building 9.x ARM...  Then this change makes more sense and as you said,
isn't changing the ABI on 9...

Ok, if that's the case, the confusion has been cleared...

Thanks.

-- 
  John-Mark Gurney				Voice: +1 415 225 5579

     "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."