svn commit: r267983 - in stable: 10/sys/dev/acpica 9/sys/dev/acpica

[John Baldwin]

Author: jhb
Date: Fri Jun 27 20:57:12 2014
New Revision: 267983
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/267983

Log:
  MFC 267647:
  Trust the state of a power resource that we get from a working _STA method
  instead of trying to cache it.

Modified:
  stable/10/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_powerres.c
Directory Properties:
  stable/10/   (props changed)

Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Modified:
  stable/9/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_powerres.c
Directory Properties:
  stable/9/sys/   (props changed)
  stable/9/sys/dev/   (props changed)

Modified: stable/10/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_powerres.c
==============================================================================
--- stable/10/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_powerres.c	Fri Jun 27 20:45:17 2014	(r267982)
+++ stable/10/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_powerres.c	Fri Jun 27 20:57:12 2014	(r267983)
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("POWERRES")
 /* Return values from _STA on a power resource */
 #define ACPI_PWR_OFF	0
 #define ACPI_PWR_ON	1
-#define ACPI_PWR_UNK	(-1)
 
 /* A relationship between a power resource and a consumer. */
 struct acpi_powerreference {
@@ -90,7 +89,6 @@ struct acpi_powerresource {
     ACPI_HANDLE				ap_resource;
     UINT64				ap_systemlevel;
     UINT64				ap_order;
-    int					ap_state;
 };
 
 static TAILQ_HEAD(acpi_powerresource_list, acpi_powerresource)
@@ -173,7 +171,6 @@ acpi_pwr_register_resource(ACPI_HANDLE r
     }
     rp->ap_systemlevel = obj->PowerResource.SystemLevel;
     rp->ap_order = obj->PowerResource.ResourceOrder;
-    rp->ap_state = ACPI_PWR_UNK;
     
     /* Sort the resource into the list */
     status = AE_OK;
@@ -638,22 +635,20 @@ acpi_pwr_switch_power(void)
 	    continue;
 	}
 
-	/* We could cache this if we trusted it not to change under us */
 	status = acpi_GetInteger(rp->ap_resource, "_STA", &cur);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 	    ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_OBJECTS, "can't get status of %s - %d\n",
 			      acpi_name(rp->ap_resource), status));
 	    /* XXX is this correct?  Always switch if in doubt? */
 	    continue;
-	} else if (rp->ap_state == ACPI_PWR_UNK)
-	    rp->ap_state = cur;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Switch if required.  Note that we ignore the result of the switch
 	 * effort; we don't know what to do if it fails, so checking wouldn't
 	 * help much.
 	 */
-	if (rp->ap_state != ACPI_PWR_ON) {
+	if (cur != ACPI_PWR_ON) {
 	    status = AcpiEvaluateObject(rp->ap_resource, "_ON", NULL, NULL);
 	    if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_OBJECTS,
@@ -661,7 +656,6 @@ acpi_pwr_switch_power(void)
 				 acpi_name(rp->ap_resource),
 				 AcpiFormatException(status)));
 	    } else {
-		rp->ap_state = ACPI_PWR_ON;
 		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_OBJECTS, "switched %s on\n",
 				 acpi_name(rp->ap_resource)));
 	    }
@@ -682,22 +676,20 @@ acpi_pwr_switch_power(void)
 	    continue;
 	}
 
-	/* We could cache this if we trusted it not to change under us */
 	status = acpi_GetInteger(rp->ap_resource, "_STA", &cur);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 	    ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_OBJECTS, "can't get status of %s - %d\n",
 			      acpi_name(rp->ap_resource), status));
 	    /* XXX is this correct?  Always switch if in doubt? */
 	    continue;
-	} else if (rp->ap_state == ACPI_PWR_UNK)
-	    rp->ap_state = cur;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Switch if required.  Note that we ignore the result of the switch
 	 * effort; we don't know what to do if it fails, so checking wouldn't
 	 * help much.
 	 */
-	if (rp->ap_state != ACPI_PWR_OFF) {
+	if (cur != ACPI_PWR_OFF) {
 	    status = AcpiEvaluateObject(rp->ap_resource, "_OFF", NULL, NULL);
 	    if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_OBJECTS,
@@ -705,7 +697,6 @@ acpi_pwr_switch_power(void)
 				 acpi_name(rp->ap_resource),
 				 AcpiFormatException(status)));
 	    } else {
-		rp->ap_state = ACPI_PWR_OFF;
 		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_OBJECTS, "switched %s off\n",
 				 acpi_name(rp->ap_resource)));
 	    }