svn commit: r262266 - in vendor/dma: . dist dist/debian dist/debian/migrate dist/debian/source dist/test

[Slawa Olhovchenkov]

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:04:50AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 05:54:59PM -0800, Xin Li wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA512
> > 
> > On 02/20/14 14:39, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > Author: bapt Date: Thu Feb 20 22:39:55 2014 New Revision: 262266 
> > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/262266
> > > 
> > > Log: Import dma 89702b7f14 (2013-02-13) into vendors
> > 
> > Are we going to remove sendmail?  Personally I don't think it's a good
> > idea to have two different delivery agents.
> > 
> That is not the initial goal, the initial goal is to be able do relay mail or
> deliver them locally without anything listening on port 25, with something easy
> to configure and with a very low footprint.

This is may be done by specific submit.cf and settings in rc.conf

> That said, yes I do really think that we should remove sendmail from base, if I
> remember correctly the discussion each time we talked about it the conclusion
> was we only need something able to relay mail to another mails server and be
> able to locally deliver mails, that is exactly the definition of dma.
> 
> to be honnest dma needs a bit of work on how it handle its retry queue, but that
> might not be long to improve.
> 
> regards,
> Bapt