svn commit: r270510 - head

[Rui Paulo]

On Aug 24, 2014, at 16:01, Don Lewis <truckman at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> 
> On 24 Aug, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> On Aug 24, 2014, at 14:44, Peter Wemm <peter at wemm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sunday 24 August 2014 21:21:54 Don Lewis wrote:
>>>> Author: truckman
>>>> Date: Sun Aug 24 21:21:54 2014
>>>> New Revision: 270510
>>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270510
>>>> 
>>>> Log:
>>>> Catch up to gcc 3.3 -> 3.4 upgrade.
>>>> 
>>>> MFC after:	3 days
>>>> 
>>>> Modified:
>>>> head/ObsoleteFiles.inc
>>>> 
>>>> Modified: head/ObsoleteFiles.inc
>>>> ============================================================================
>>>> == --- head/ObsoleteFiles.inc	Sun Aug 24 19:31:26 2014	(r270509)
>>>> +++ head/ObsoleteFiles.inc	Sun Aug 24 21:21:54 2014	(r270510)
>>>> @@ -3205,6 +3205,202 @@ OLD_FILES+=lib/geom/geom_concat.so.1
>>>> OLD_FILES+=lib/geom/geom_label.so.1
>>>> OLD_FILES+=lib/geom/geom_nop.so.1
>>>> OLD_FILES+=lib/geom/geom_stripe.so.1
>>>> +# 20040728: GCC 3.4.2
>>>> +OLD_DIRS+=usr/include/c++/3.3
>>>> +OLD_FILES+=usr/include/c++/3.3/FlexLexer.h
>>>> +OLD_FILES+=usr/include/c++/3.3/algorithm
>>>> +OLD_FILES+=usr/include/c++/3.3/backward/algo.h
>>> 
>>> I suspect that there's a story here that needs to be told..
>> 
>> Yes, if it hasn't been a problem in 10 years, why do it now?
> 
> I found those leftovers on one of my machines.  They are probably
> harmless cruft, but I thought a few other folks might be in the same
> situation.
> 
> One could argue that older entries should eventually get pruned.  We've
> got stuff in there dating back to 1996 ...

Right.  I don't think we have a policy on this, so I can't argue against your change. 

--
Rui Paulo