svn commit: r263346 - in head: etc/mtree tools/build/mk tools/regression/usr.bin/make usr.bin/make usr.bin/make/tests usr.bin/make/tests/archives/fmt_44bsd usr.bin/make/tests/archives/fmt_44bsd_mod...
Julio Merino
jmmv at freebsd.org
Mon Apr 21 22:51:23 UTC 2014
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Julio Merino <jmmv at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at des.no> wrote:
>> Julio Merino <jmmv at FreeBSD.org> writes:
>>> Log:
>>> Migrate tools/regression/usr.bin/make/ to the new tests layout.
>>>
>>> Note that these tests are for fmake, not bmake, and thus they are not
>>> installed nor run when bmake is selected (the default). Yes, I have
>>> wasted a *ton* of time on moving tests for no real reason other than
>>> ensuring they are not left behind.
>>>
>>> But maybe, just maybe, it was not work in vain: the majority of these
>>> tests also work with bmake and the few that don't may point at broken
>>> stuff. For example, the tests for the "archive" feature do not work
>>> with bmake, but bmake's manpage and source tree seem to imply that they
>>> should. So... to be investigated later; need to poke sjg at .
>>
>> This, or a subsequent but related commit, broke the WITHOUT_BMAKE build:
>
> Apologies for not having gotten to this yet. Will try to deal with it
> during the weekend or next week when I'm back home. (Still traveling
> after AsiaBSDCon and been focusing on fixing some other issues in the
> testing cluster.)
Finally got to this. Just committed r264742 which will hopefully fix it.
> In the meantime: could someone enlighten me as to why !bmake is still supported?
Question still stands.
More information about the svn-src-all
mailing list