svn commit: r264280 - in head/sys: conf modules

[Sean Bruno]

On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 14:30 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 09, 2014 1:45:04 pm Sean Bruno wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 11:47 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 5:39:52 pm Sean Bruno wrote:
> > > > Author: sbruno
> > > > Date: Tue Apr  8 21:39:51 2014
> > > > New Revision: 264280
> > > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/264280
> > > > 
> > > > Log:
> > > >   Actually, since this is what I thought I was doing, only allow the
> > > >   binmisc code to be build on amd64/i386 for the kernel.
> > > >   
> > > >   Update NOTES with some indication of what this code is used for.
> > > >   
> > > >   Pointed out by jhb@ ... thanks!
> > > >   
> > > >   Submitted by:	jhb@
> > > > 
> > > > Modified:
> > > >   head/sys/conf/NOTES
> > > >   head/sys/conf/options.amd64
> > > >   head/sys/conf/options.i386
> > > >   head/sys/modules/Makefile
> > > 
> > > Why not enable it on all platforms?  I don't see anything inherently
> > > MD about it.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > This is purely an artifact of my comfort level with the code and the
> > cases that I am using/testing.
> > 
> > If someone can verify that it works on other architectures, I'm more
> > than happy to enable on all platforms.
> 
> Does it build on other platforms?  I think it is better to enable it if
> it builds to avoid bitrot.
> 


Untested.  I agree that its better, I just haven't done it.  I think
this was a protective measure on my part to not inflict more work upon
myself as I was already slight agitated at how long it took to get to
the point of getting mips32 support implemented via qemu.  

sean
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/attachments/20140409/b3919c29/attachment.sig>