svn commit: r248751 - head/share/mk

John Baldwin jhb at freebsd.org
Mon Apr 1 19:01:52 UTC 2013


On Monday, April 01, 2013 1:17:48 pm Ed Maste wrote:
> On 1 April 2013 12:34, Chris Rees <crees at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On 1 April 2013 17:17, John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 4:11:10 pm Ed Maste wrote:
> >>> Author: emaste
> >>> Date: Tue Mar 26 20:11:09 2013
> >>> New Revision: 248751
> >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248751
> >>>
> >>> Log:
> >>>   Unconditionally include ${SRCCONF} if overridden
> >>>
> >>>   This avoids silently failing to include ${SRCCONF} specified by a 
make(1)
> >>>   invocation.
> >>>
> >>> Modified:
> >>>   head/share/mk/bsd.own.mk
> >>>
> >>> Modified: head/share/mk/bsd.own.mk
> >>>
> >> 
==============================================================================
> >>> --- head/share/mk/bsd.own.mk  Tue Mar 26 20:04:45 2013        (r248750)
> >>> +++ head/share/mk/bsd.own.mk  Tue Mar 26 20:11:09 2013        (r248751)
> >>> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ __<bsd.own.mk>__:
> >>>
> >>>  .if !defined(_WITHOUT_SRCCONF)
> >>>  SRCCONF?=    /etc/src.conf
> >>> -.if exists(${SRCCONF})
> >>> +.if exists(${SRCCONF}) || ${SRCCONF} != "/etc/src.conf"
> >>>  .include "${SRCCONF}"
> >>>  .endif
> >>>  .endif
> >>
> >> Hmm, I'm confused why this matters?  Was exists() failing for a file that 
did
> >> exist?  Can you give a more specific use case?
> >
> > I think it's useful that if you've set SRCCONF in make.conf, the build
> > should complain about a lack of its existence.
> >
> > A single character spelling error in the name of SRCCONF will have the
> > build silently failing to include it, thus resulting in enormous
> > frustration when your settings aren't applied for some non-obvious
> > reason...
> 
> Exactly. In my case I had incorrectly specified the path to my
> src.conf and it took longer than I'd like to admit to discover the
> failure.

Ahhh, ok.  That makes sense then.  I had parsed the log message differently
somehow to mean that the file wasn't being included and that that was silent, 
not that there was a lack of an error for a non-existent file that was 
explicitly specified.

-- 
John Baldwin


More information about the svn-src-all mailing list