svn commit: r242402 - in head/sys: kern vm
Ian Lepore
freebsd at damnhippie.dyndns.org
Thu Nov 1 14:01:17 UTC 2012
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 10:42 +0000, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On 11/1/12, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:33:51PM +0000, Attilio Rao wrote:
> > A> > Doesn't this padding to cache line size only help x86 processors in an
> > A> > SMP kernel? I was expecting to see some #ifdef SMP so that we don't
> > pay
> > A> > a big price for no gain in small-memory ARM systems and such. But
> > maybe
> > A> > I'm misunderstanding the reason for the padding.
> > A>
> > A> I didn't want to do this because this would be meaning that SMP option
> > A> may become a completely killer for modules/kernel ABI compatibility.
> >
> > Do we support loading non-SMP modules on SMP kernel and vice versa?
>
> Actually that's my point, we do.
>
> Attilio
>
>
Well we've got other similar problems lurking then. What about a module
compiled on an arm system that had #define CACHE_LINE_SIZE 32 and then
it gets run on a different arm system whose kernel is compiled with
#define CACHE_LINE_SIZE 64?
-- Ian
More information about the svn-src-all
mailing list