svn commit: r238622 - head/etc/rc.d

Doug Barton dougb at FreeBSD.org
Thu Aug 2 21:51:45 UTC 2012


On 8/2/2012 2:25 PM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Hiroki Sato <hrs at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>>  Just curious, why ip6addrctl_enable=NO is not enough here? 

Because the behavior of the script for =NO is to prefer v4.

>>  I would
>>  like to eliminate yes/no/none keywords in $ip6addrctl_policy because
>>  such keywords are vague.  If we need the empty rule for some reason,
>>  "empty" would be a better name for the policy, I think.

Personally I think that the established meanings of "yes" and "no" are
well understood, but I wouldn't object to emitting a warning for them to
help the user make a more explicit selection.

While we're at it, the way that the current script replicates the test
for checkyesno in case is bogus, and should be changed. I had fixed this
in the change set that you(hrs) backed out. To stick with the structure
of the current script, something like this would work:

http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/ip6addrctl.diff

That also brings in the warning described above.

> i just wanted to make sure that there is a way to absolutely make sure
> that there is no default address selection policy installed. the wide
> know rule 9 of rfc 3484 is really messing things up for dns-style load
> balancing. even when ipv6 is not used.

Maksim, can you say more about this? Or point me to a reference that has
the discussion?

> personally, i don't think that
> "none" is unreasonable word for "ip6addrctl_policy", but i don't feel
> particularly strongly about it. any name will do as long as original
> functionality is preserved.

I agree that "none" is reasonable, and is in line with other rc.d knobs.
I would not object to "empty" being added as a synonym though.

One request however, is this new knob documented in rc.conf.5? If not,
can you do that please? :)

Doug

-- 

    I am only one, but I am one.  I cannot do everything, but I can do
    something.  And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what
    I can do.
			-- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)


More information about the svn-src-all mailing list