svn commit: r219003 - head/usr.bin/nice
remko at elvandar.org
Fri Feb 25 10:23:08 UTC 2011
On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:47 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 24, 2011 2:03:33 pm Remko Lodder wrote:
> [contex restored:
> +A priority of 19 or 20 will prevent a process from taking any cycles from
> +others at nice 0 or better.]
[strip information overload].
So, what is the consensus instead of overwelming me with too much information?
/"\ Best regards, | remko at FreeBSD.org
\ / Remko Lodder |
X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
More information about the svn-src-all