svn commit: r214984 - stable/8/lib/libproc
Rui Paulo
rpaulo at FreeBSD.org
Mon Nov 8 15:37:15 UTC 2010
On Nov 8, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>>>>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:06:12 +0000
>>>>>> Rui Paulo <rpaulo at FreeBSD.org> said:
>
> rpaulo> It's on my plans, but basename_r is not POSIX and there was a private discussion about it a couple of weeks ago. The conclusion is that we should adopt the Android semantics of basename_r().
>
> I found the thread, and understood it. However, I still wonderling if
> breaking thread-safeness in proc_sym.c is okay, though it may not be
> necessary.
We can live with it for now while I work on a new basename_r().
Regards,
--
Rui Paulo
More information about the svn-src-all
mailing list