svn commit: r204650 - head/share/man/man9

[Ed Schouten]

* John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > Maybe I'm flogging a dead horse, but this is 2010. Whether or not a
> > compiler supports C99 is no longer an issue. We're already far beyond
> > the point of going back to C89.
> 
> The point is that if you look at almost all of the new-bus drivers in the 
> tree, they do not use C99 initializers to initialize their KOBJ class.
> Given that, I do not see a reason to make driver(9) document a style that
> almost no drivers use.  If we did want to do something different, we
> should use the DEFINE_CLASS_0() macro that can be used to declare a KOBJ
> class.

That sounds like a good argument. Thanks for explaining!

-- 
 Ed Schouten <ed at 80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/attachments/20100303/c49ee69b/attachment.pgp