svn commit: r204591 - in head: sbin/ipfw sys/conf sys/net sys/netinet sys/netinet/ipfw sys/netinet/ipfw/test

[Kostik Belousov]

On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 08:03:44PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 08:51:30PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> ...
> > > --- head/sbin/ipfw/Makefile	Tue Mar  2 17:34:11 2010	(r204590)
> > > +++ head/sbin/ipfw/Makefile	Tue Mar  2 17:40:48 2010	(r204591)
> > > @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
> > >  PROG=	ipfw
> > >  SRCS=	ipfw2.c dummynet.c ipv6.c main.c nat.c altq.c
> > >  WARNS?=	2
> > > -DPADD=	${LIBUTIL}
> > >  LDADD=	-lutil
> > >  MAN=	ipfw.8
> > Removal of DPADD is most likely regression ?
> 
> possibly.
> i couldn't figure out why it was there in the
> first place, can you clarify what it was for ?
To depend on the libutil, so that ipfw is reloaded when libutil.a is
changed.

The question I do not know answer for, is why do we need LDADD.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/attachments/20100302/6860922a/attachment.pgp