On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:11:14AM +0000, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > - Some improvements on the exiting code, like replacing memcpy with > strlcpy/strcpy Why is this an improvement? At least for non-trivial sizes, it is quite likely to be a regression. Especially using strlcpy as replacement for memcpy+\0 is bogus. Joerg