In message: <20090115020752.52566769.stas at FreeBSD.org>
Stanislav Sedov <stas at FreeBSD.org> writes:
: > + shift = 8 * (reg & 3);
: >
:
: Would it make sense to replace this with
: > + shift = (reg & 3) << 3;
:
: to not rely on possible compiler optimizations?
I don't think that it matters all that much these days...
Warner