In message: <20090115020752.52566769.stas at FreeBSD.org> Stanislav Sedov <stas at FreeBSD.org> writes: : > + shift = 8 * (reg & 3); : > : : Would it make sense to replace this with : > + shift = (reg & 3) << 3; : : to not rely on possible compiler optimizations? I don't think that it matters all that much these days... Warner