svn commit: r190943 - head/include

[David Schultz]

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:00:54 -0400
> > > > Can't we just put a patch in ports tree itself? What meant under 'no
> > > > clean solution emerged'? I can prepare a patch, if needed.
> > > 	I think so, too.  I have a quick hack patch.
> > As I mentioned to vd@ on 3/20, I'd prefer something like
> > that. Does your proposed patch also work for the ports that depend
> > on GNU Pth, some of which may depend on signal.h?
> 
> 	Yes, no problem!  Pth required singal.h's definision(SIGINT,
> 	SIGQUIT, ...), and it was already token care in pthread.h.in
> 	like following:
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> /*
>  * Protect namespace, because possibly existing vendor Pthread stuff
>  * would certainly conflict with our defintions of pthread*_t.
>  */
> #define pthread_t              __vendor_pthread_t
>   :
> #include <sys/signal.h>    /* for sigset_t        */
>   :
> /*
>  * Unprotect namespace, so we can define our own variants now
>  */
> #undef pthread_t
>  :
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I don't understand how this is related to the problem; signal.h
and sys/signal.h are not the same header, nor does one include the
other.