svn commit: r190919 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 amd64/include
i386/i386 i386/include
Ed Schouten
ed at 80386.nl
Sat Apr 11 16:51:16 UTC 2009
Hi Steve,
* Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> I thought Christoph and bde were still hashing out the correctness
> of this patch.
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/2009-April/012064.html
Yes, so I've only committed a subset of changes of which there were no
major (or in my opinion valid) objections:
- The construct that we use now works with many versions of GCC. There
is absolutely no reason why we should still try to support GCC <2.95.
- There was also the discussion about __inline vs inline and __volatile
vs __volatile. As Christoph and I noticed, there is also a lot of
inconsistency between the usage of the keywords in the current sources
we have.
I already spent much time discussing this issue with Christoph to get to
at least some compromise.
--
Ed Schouten <ed at 80386.nl>
WWW: http://80386.nl/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/attachments/20090411/1f6ecfd5/attachment.pgp
More information about the svn-src-all
mailing list