svn commit: r185356 - head/sys/dev/ixgbe

[Ivan Voras]

2008/11/27 M. Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com>:
> In message: <20081126213204.14db9a63 at kan.dnsalias.net>
>            Alexander Kabaev <kabaev at gmail.com> writes:

> : Is C99 construct here intentional? If so, when did we agree on using
> : only C99 compilers on our code base?
>
> I'm not sure about *THIS* c99 construct, but we've been heavily
> relying on the field name initializer stuff for a couple of years now.

And at least the newer GEOM code also uses c99 variable declarations
(not only for initializers - they were c99 from the start).